<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search By Meaning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/07/29/search-by-meaning-vs-the-search-for-meaning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/07/29/search-by-meaning-vs-the-search-for-meaning/</link>
	<description>Good Ideas Have Good Consequences!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/07/29/search-by-meaning-vs-the-search-for-meaning/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/07/29/search-by-meaning-vs-the-search-for-meaning/#comment-981</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on the job, Marc. I know you&#039;re a big thinker and I&#039;m delighted to hear about that.

Hope we&#039;ll still be able to do a little &quot;fencing&quot; around this subject!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on the job, Marc. I know you&#8217;re a big thinker and I&#8217;m delighted to hear about that.</p>
<p>Hope we&#8217;ll still be able to do a little &#8220;fencing&#8221; around this subject!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evolvingtrends</title>
		<link>http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/07/29/search-by-meaning-vs-the-search-for-meaning/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>evolvingtrends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/07/29/search-by-meaning-vs-the-search-for-meaning/#comment-980</guid>
		<description>Luckily, I&#039;m not an opinion journalist although I could easily pass for one.

You&#039;ll see a lot of &#039;doing&#039; from us now that we&#039;re talking less :)

BTW, just started as Chief Architect with a VC funded Silicon Valley startup so that&#039;s keeping me busy, but I&#039;m recruiting developers and orchestrating a P2P 3.0 / Web 3.0 / Semantic Web (AI-enabled) open source project consistent with the vision we&#039;ev outlined. 

:] ... dzzt.

Marc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckily, I&#8217;m not an opinion journalist although I could easily pass for one.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll see a lot of &#8216;doing&#8217; from us now that we&#8217;re talking less :)</p>
<p>BTW, just started as Chief Architect with a VC funded Silicon Valley startup so that&#8217;s keeping me busy, but I&#8217;m recruiting developers and orchestrating a P2P 3.0 / Web 3.0 / Semantic Web (AI-enabled) open source project consistent with the vision we&#8217;ev outlined. </p>
<p>:] &#8230; dzzt.</p>
<p>Marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/07/29/search-by-meaning-vs-the-search-for-meaning/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/07/29/search-by-meaning-vs-the-search-for-meaning/#comment-979</guid>
		<description>Hey there, Marc.
Have talked to people about semantic web a bit more now, and will get my thoughts together on the subject before too long. The big issue, basically, is buy-in from the gazillions of content producers we have now. My impression is the big business will lead on semantic web, because it&#039;s more useful to them right now, rather than you or I as &#039;opinion/journalist&#039; types.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there, Marc.<br />
Have talked to people about semantic web a bit more now, and will get my thoughts together on the subject before too long. The big issue, basically, is buy-in from the gazillions of content producers we have now. My impression is the big business will lead on semantic web, because it&#8217;s more useful to them right now, rather than you or I as &#8216;opinion/journalist&#8217; types.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evolvingtrends</title>
		<link>http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/07/29/search-by-meaning-vs-the-search-for-meaning/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>evolvingtrends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 14:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/07/29/search-by-meaning-vs-the-search-for-meaning/#comment-826</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re one piece short of Lego Land.

I have to make the trek down to San Diego and see what it&#039;s all about.

How do you like that for context!? :)

Yesterday I got burnt real bad at Crane beach in Ipswich (not to be confused with Cisco&#039;s IP Switch.) The water was freezing. Anyway, on the way there I was told about the one time when the kids (my nieces) asked their dad (who is a Cisco engineer) why Ipswich is called Ipswich. He said he didn&#039;t know. They said &quot;just make up a reason!!!!!!&quot; (since they can&#039;t take &quot;I don&#039;t know&quot; for an answer)  So he said they initially wanted to call it PI (pie) but decided it to switch the letters so it became IPSWICH. The kids loved that answer and kept asking him whenever they had their friends on a beach trip to explain why Ipswich is called Ipswich. I don&#039;t get the humor. My logic circuits are not that sensitive. Somehow they see the illogic of it and they think it&#039;s hilarious.

Engineers and scientists tend to approach the problem through the most complex path possible because that&#039;s dictated by the context of their thinking, but genetic algorithms could do a better job at that, yet that&#039;s absolutely not what I&#039;m hinting is the answer.

The answer is a lot more simple (but the way simple answers are derived is often thru deep thought that abstracts/hides all the complexity)

I&#039;ll stop one piece short cuz that will get people to take a shot at it and thereby create more discussion around the subject, in general, which will inevitably get more people to coalesce around the Web 3.0 idea.

[badly sun burnt face] + ]    ... It&#039;s time to experiment with a digi cam ... i.e. towards a photo + audio + web 3.0 blog!

An 8-mega pixel camera phone will do just fine! (see my post on tagging people in the real world.. it is another very simple idea but I like this one much much better.)

Marc

p.s. my neurons are still in perfectly good order but I can&#039;t wear my socks!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re one piece short of Lego Land.</p>
<p>I have to make the trek down to San Diego and see what it&#8217;s all about.</p>
<p>How do you like that for context!? :)</p>
<p>Yesterday I got burnt real bad at Crane beach in Ipswich (not to be confused with Cisco&#8217;s IP Switch.) The water was freezing. Anyway, on the way there I was told about the one time when the kids (my nieces) asked their dad (who is a Cisco engineer) why Ipswich is called Ipswich. He said he didn&#8217;t know. They said &#8220;just make up a reason!!!!!!&#8221; (since they can&#8217;t take &#8220;I don&#8217;t know&#8221; for an answer)  So he said they initially wanted to call it PI (pie) but decided it to switch the letters so it became IPSWICH. The kids loved that answer and kept asking him whenever they had their friends on a beach trip to explain why Ipswich is called Ipswich. I don&#8217;t get the humor. My logic circuits are not that sensitive. Somehow they see the illogic of it and they think it&#8217;s hilarious.</p>
<p>Engineers and scientists tend to approach the problem through the most complex path possible because that&#8217;s dictated by the context of their thinking, but genetic algorithms could do a better job at that, yet that&#8217;s absolutely not what I&#8217;m hinting is the answer.</p>
<p>The answer is a lot more simple (but the way simple answers are derived is often thru deep thought that abstracts/hides all the complexity)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll stop one piece short cuz that will get people to take a shot at it and thereby create more discussion around the subject, in general, which will inevitably get more people to coalesce around the Web 3.0 idea.</p>
<p>[badly sun burnt face] + ]    &#8230; It&#8217;s time to experiment with a digi cam &#8230; i.e. towards a photo + audio + web 3.0 blog!</p>
<p>An 8-mega pixel camera phone will do just fine! (see my post on tagging people in the real world.. it is another very simple idea but I like this one much much better.)</p>
<p>Marc</p>
<p>p.s. my neurons are still in perfectly good order but I can&#8217;t wear my socks!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qxcvz</title>
		<link>http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/07/29/search-by-meaning-vs-the-search-for-meaning/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>qxcvz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 07:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/07/29/search-by-meaning-vs-the-search-for-meaning/#comment-824</guid>
		<description>context is a kind of meaning, innit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>context is a kind of meaning, innit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
